Certain book being
banned in school and public libraries has been a debate in our society for man
y years. Lots of classic books get criticized for their “questionable content
that overprotective parents have been complaining about. But classics like my book,
Lord of The Flies, by William Golding, should
not be banned from school libraries because they can teach us many things and
the younger public deserve to read them.
Classics are an
important addition to school libraries. They focus on difficult to cope with
and understand subjects, like loss and death. For example, from an article
focusing on the subject of banned books stated, “Not only were these books ones
we read intently, and over and over again, they were books that taught us
important things.”(Doll 2). Lord of the Flies, like these classics, focuses on
the issues of proper leadership and organization, and the consequences for
young people in certain situations when you don’t have these traits. For
example, one scene that shows strong emotion over leadership is a quote from
when the main character, Ralph, and Jack are arguing.
“[Ralph] isn’t a
hunter. He’d never have got us meat. He isn’t a prefect and we don’t know
anything about him. He just gives order and expects people to obey for nothing…”
(Golding 130).
Furthermore,
banning book like Lord of the Flies would just make them more appealing to the
Public. People find a book more appealing to read when it been shut out by
normal ways of obtaining them, making them more worthwhile to read. One
librarian once stated “ ‘ I don’t think banning a book ruins its reputation or
makes children afraid to read it. If anything, the opposite will happen. Young
people are still going to read the series, it’s still going to be hugely
popular, and-guess what!-it’s still going to get kids to read who might not
have otherwise…’ ” (Doll 4). Also, one author stated his opinion when his book
was called to be banned. “ ‘It’s a badge of honor to have your book banned from
schools and libraries, only because it means your books have become popular and
are being noticed. Unpopular books seldom get banned. I’ve never noticed any
kind of sales decrease because of censorship campaigns. Usually they prove to
be good publicity’ ” (Doll 2).
Yet despite all
this, people still head toward banning books due to their belief that most
books are “inappropriate” for the younger ages. But most books are mostly
falsely or vaguely accused. In Lord of The Flies, one of the books for banning,
there’s not really any hint of killing. One quote, “ Softly, surrounded by a
fringe of exquisite bright creatures, itself a silver shape beneath the
steadfast constellation, Simon’s dead body moved toward the open sea” (Golding
157), Doesn’t have any hint of the death and mostly presents itself in a vague
manner.
The idea of
banning books, especially classic, is a horrible idea. Unless the book is
absolutely offensive and kids shouldn’t really be in contact with it, then a
book should be banned. But in this case scenario, books really shouldn’t be
banned.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI'm honestly very interested in the way you were able to defend your argument about the fact that classics shouldn't be banned. In addition, I enjoy that fact that you were able to defend the many benefits of of the book and your view of the book.
ReplyDeleteoveral great essay looks like you spent a lot of time on it but you should elaborate more in the concussion.
ReplyDelete