Certain book being
banned in school and public libraries has been a debate in our society for man
y years. Lots of classic books get criticized for their “questionable content
that overprotective parents have been complaining about. But classics like my book,
Lord of The Flies, should not be banned from school libraries because they can
teach us many things and the younger public deserve to read them.
Classics are an
important addition to school libraries. They focus on difficult to cope with
and understand subjects, like loss and death.For example, from an article
focusing on the subject of banned books, “Not only were these books ones we
read intently, and over and over again, they were books that taught us
important things.”(Doll 2). Lord of the Flies, like these classics, focuses on
the issues of proper leadership and organization, and the consequences for
young people in certain situations when
you don’t have these things. For example, one scene that shows strong emotion
over leadership is a quote from when the main character, Ralph, and Jack are
arguing. “Ralph, he isn’t a chief, he ain’t a prefect. He’s a coward. He’s like
Piggy. All of this talk-“.(Jack, Lord of the Flies).
Furthermore,
banning book like Lord of the Flies would just make them more appealing to the
Public. People find a book more appealing to read when it been shut out by
normal ways of obtaining them, making them more worthwhile to read. One librarian
once stated “ I don’t think banning a book ruins its reputation or makes
children afraid to read it. If anything, the opposite will happen. Young people
are still going to read the series, it’s still going to be hugely popular, and-guess
what!-it’s still going to get kids to read who might not have otherwise.”
(Meade 4). Also, one author said “it’s a badge of honor to have your book
banned from schools and libraries, only because it means your books have become
popular and are being noticed. Unpopular books seldom get banned. I’ve never
noticed any kind of sales decrease because of censorship campaigns. Usually
they prove to be good publicity” (Stine 4).
Yet despite all
this, people still head toward banning books due to their belief that most
books are “inappropriate” for the younger ages. But most books are mostly
falsely or vaguely accused. In Lord of The Flies, one of the books for banning,
there’s not really any hint of killing. One quote, “ Softly, surrounded v=by a
fringe of exquisite bright creatures, itself a silver shape beneath the
steadfast constellation, Simon’s dead body moved toward the open sea” Doesn’t have
any hint of the death and mostly presents itself in a vague manner.
The idea of
banning books, especially classic, is a horrible idea. Unless the book is absolutely
offensive and kids shouldn’t really be in contact with it, then a book should
be banned. But in this case scenario, books really shouldn’t be banned.